1. But really, for the genealogy and family history, we knowthat each rule there was an exclusion. Good vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact no body extremely understands exactly how to use the fresh new conditions orrules which have any decisive adjective such as constantly, possibly, probably,almost certainly, an such like. It will be interesting in the event the there other instances ofjointures are generated per year or two just after a well-known marriage go out.
2. Is there an extant dispensation to the wedding of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who were third cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, immediately after taken out of the fresh new fifth LordClifford? Who would restrict its relationships day.
Arthur
Allegedly, in the event that a great dispensation was found and you can offered, it would havebeen because of the among the many after the, that can appear in this new correspondingregister publication, when it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop away from Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop away from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In the event the tenth Lord Clifford do get married in early 1487 [state January] andhas E afterwards in this season, does new chronology maybe not performs?
John hands?
Age created during the late 1487, Henry created during the 1488/9, Joan within the ,an such like. completing the new brands of your own publish of . If the (a) thechronology however functions; and you will (b) their matrimony part was not low; thenwe simply have the fresh 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s that’s when you look at the oppositionto the fresh new supposition you to definitely she are a valid daughter https://kissbrides.com/american-women/pembroke-pines-fl/.
6. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Is the Clifford daughters the brand new onlyknown Henry VII affairs excluded? Have there been others? In this case,wouldn’t you to echo defectively about this document due to the fact a source?
Away from reviews You will find produced from the latest c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith the newest 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, that are
In the c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin a great Clifford pedigree, but instead in the St. John pedigree. As the I’mnot accustomed the fresh new St. John friends, pursuing the is the suggestions asit seems about c.1505 pedigree, given that extracted from the fresh new 1834 Coll. Most readily useful. etGen. article. The phrasing during the quotations is exactly as it appears inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
«Zero. XII.»Of my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.»f.288, 296, 317, 318.»Margaret Duchess of Somerset had around three husbands.» By the «John Duke ofSomerset» she had «My personal Woman the latest King’s Mom.» who’d «The King.» whohad «Prince «By the «Sir Oliver Saint John, first spouse.» she got step three daus & dos sons:
Good. «Edith, married so you’re able to Geoffrey Pole from Buckinghamshire.» They’d:A1. «Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married into the Woman Margaret, dau. off theDuke from Clarence.» They’d: «Harry. «A2. «Alianor, wedded to Ralph Verney, Esq.» They had: «John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a separate youngster, unnamed].»
B. «John Ssint John, esq.» He’d four children:B1. «Sir John Saint John, Knight.» who’d «Four daughters and you may oneson.»B2. «Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.» They had «Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.»B3. «Age, married so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. of Lincolnshire.»B4. «An effective Nun from Shaftesbury.»B5. «Oliver Saint John.»
C. «Dame Mary, married to help you Sir Richard Frognall.» That they had:C1. «Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and sistren.» Which have issueindicated, not called.C2. «Age, wedded so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.»
D. «Elizabeth, married very first on Lord Zouche; after on LordScrope from Bolton.» Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] » Catesby.» They’d:»Age. George. John. William.»D2. [because of the Scrope] » Conyers.» That have issueindicated not entitled.
Margaret Duchess of Somerset, from the «Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.»had: «John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. off K. Edward IV.» andthey got «Elizabeth.»